CO-197 Denial Code: Prior Authorization Absent
CO-197 means the service required precertification, prior authorization, notification, or pre-treatment review, and the payer has no record of it. Under CO, the provider generally absorbs the amount and cannot bill the patient unless the denial is overturned.
Quick facts
- Code
- CO-197 (CARC 197)
- Status
- Active In use since October 31, 2006; last modified May 1, 2018.
- Code set
- Claim Adjustment Reason Codes (CARC)
- Group codes
-
- CO (Contractual Obligation): The provider is responsible for failing to obtain the required authorization. A network contract typically bars billing the patient for it.
- PR (Patient Responsibility): Less common. Some plans make the member responsible for obtaining authorization, for example when seeing an out-of-network provider. Check the plan and your contract before billing the patient.
- Official description
Precertification/authorization/notification/pre-treatment absent.
X12 Claim Adjustment Reason Codes, retrieved September 25, 2026- Last verified
- against the official X12 list.
What CO-197 means
CARC 197 reads “Precertification/authorization/notification/pre-treatment absent.” The payer requires advance approval or notice for this service, and when it adjudicated the claim, it found none. The term covers several flavors of the same requirement: prior authorization for procedures and imaging, precertification for admissions, notification of inpatient stays, and pre-treatment review for dental and some therapy services.
CO-197 is one of the most consequential preventable denials, because it often involves high-cost services and many payers don’t allow authorizations after the fact.
Example: an outpatient MRI is performed on the date it’s ordered. The payer requires prior authorization for advanced imaging, but none was requested. The claim is denied CO-197. The payer doesn’t offer retro-authorization for non-urgent imaging, so the amount is written off.
Common causes
- No authorization requested because staff didn’t know the service required one.
- Authorization requested but not approved before the service, or still pending.
- Authorization number missing from the claim (box 23 or the 837 REF segment), so the payer couldn’t link it.
- Approval issued to a different provider, NPI, or location than the one billing.
- Service changed during the visit, such as a different or additional procedure than what was approved.
- Plan changed (new payer or new plan year) and the authorization from the old plan doesn’t carry over.
- Admission notification not given within the payer’s window.
How to fix it
- Search your records for any authorization or reference number, including call logs and portal submissions.
- If an authorization exists, confirm it matches the provider, service codes, dates, and location, then add it to box 23 and submit a corrected claim (resubmission code 7 in box 22 with the original claim number) or ask the payer to attach it.
- If none exists, ask whether the payer accepts retro-authorization requests and within what window. Submit clinical documentation promptly.
- Appeal when the service was emergent, eligibility was unknown at the time of service, the authorization was requested but not acted on, or the service didn’t actually require authorization under the payer’s list.
- If nothing applies, write off the CO amount. Do not transfer it to the patient.
How to prevent it
- Check authorization requirements at scheduling using each payer’s current list, which often changes annually or quarterly.
- Track authorizations in one place with number, dates, units, provider, and location, and attach them to claims automatically.
- Re-verify eligibility and plan before the service, since a plan change can void an existing authorization.
- Build a hard stop in scheduling for services on authorization lists without an approval on file.
- Include the authorization number on every claim that needs it. The Claims Validator can flag services that commonly require authorization when box 23 is blank.
- Learn more in prior authorization and referral denials and preventable denials.
Specialty notes
Behavioral health (intensive outpatient, partial hospitalization, psychological testing, and some psychotherapy under certain plans), PT/OT (visits after an initial allowance), DME, and advanced imaging are among the services most commonly subject to authorization. Requirements vary widely by payer and plan.
Remark codes that may appear with CO-197
- M62 (Missing/incomplete/invalid treatment authorization code.): The treatment authorization code is missing, incomplete, or invalid on the claim.
- N54 (Claim information is inconsistent with pre-certified/authorized services.): The claim doesn't match the services that were pre-certified or authorized.
- N758 (Adjusted based on the prior authorization decision.): The adjustment was based on the payer's prior authorization decision.
Related and easily confused codes
- CO-198 (Precertification/notification/authorization/pre-treatment exceeded.): An authorization existed but was exceeded: too many units, visits, or days, or an expired approval.
- CO-15Deactivated (The authorization number is missing, invalid, or does not apply to the billed services or provider.): Deactivated. It once covered an authorization number that was missing, invalid, or not applicable to the provider. Today the same problem may be flagged with a remark code such as M62.
- CO-243 (Services not authorized by network/primary care providers.): Services not authorized by a network or primary care provider.
- CO-288 (Referral absent): A referral, rather than a prior authorization, was absent.
- CO-50 (These are non-covered services because this is not deemed a 'medical necessity' by the payer.): Medical necessity denial, which an authorization often addresses up front.
CO-197 FAQ
Can I get a retroactive authorization after CO-197?
Some payers accept retro-authorization requests within a limited window, especially for urgent or emergency services, or when eligibility wasn't known at the time. Many don't. Check the payer's provider manual or call provider services.
Can I bill the patient for CO-197?
Not under the CO group code. The authorization requirement is usually the network provider's responsibility, so the amount is written off unless you win an appeal.
What if I had an authorization but still got CO-197?
Check that the authorization number is in box 23 or the 837 prior authorization reference, and that the provider, service, dates, and location on the claim match the approval. Then submit a corrected claim or ask the payer to link the authorization.
Is CO-197 appealable?
Yes, especially if you have proof an authorization was obtained or requested, the service was an emergency, or the payer's rules didn't require authorization for that service. Include call reference numbers, portal screenshots, and records.
What's the difference between CO-197 and CO-198?
CO-197 means no authorization was on file. CO-198 means one existed, but the claim went beyond it, such as more units or visits, or dates outside the approved period.